By Anthony Tromba

One of the main basic questions in arithmetic is whether or not a space minimizing floor spanning a contour in 3 house is immersed or now not; i.e. does its by-product have maximal rank far and wide.

The function of this monograph is to give an basic evidence of this very basic and lovely mathematical end result. The exposition follows the unique line of assault initiated via Jesse Douglas in his Fields medal paintings in 1931, particularly use Dirichlet's power in place of region. Remarkably, the writer exhibits how one can calculate arbitrarily excessive orders of derivatives of Dirichlet's strength outlined at the endless dimensional manifold of all surfaces spanning a contour, breaking new floor within the Calculus of diversifications, the place commonly simply the second one spinoff or edition is calculated.

The monograph starts off with effortless examples resulting in an evidence in a number of circumstances that may be provided in a graduate direction in both manifolds or complicated research. hence this monograph calls for basically the main simple wisdom of research, advanced research and topology and will for this reason be learn by means of nearly somebody with a simple graduate education.

**Read Online or Download A Theory of Branched Minimal Surfaces PDF**

**Similar differential geometry books**

**Riemannian Geometry: A Beginner's Guide (Jones and Bartlett Books in Mathematics) **

This vintage textual content serves as a device for self-study; it's also used as a uncomplicated textual content for undergraduate classes in differential geometry. The author's skill to extract the basic parts of the idea in a lucid and concise model permits the scholar quick access to the fabric and permits the teacher so as to add emphasis and canopy precise themes.

**Natural Operations in Differential Geometry**

The literature on traditional bundles and common operators in differential geometry, used to be beforehand, scattered within the mathematical magazine literature. This booklet is the 1st monograph at the topic, gathering this fabric in a unified presentation. The booklet starts with an creation to differential geometry stressing naturality and performance, and the overall concept of connections on arbitrary fibered manifolds.

**Rigidity Theorems For Actions Of Product Groups And Countable Borel Equivalence Relations**

This memoir is either a contribution to the idea of Borel equivalence kinfolk, thought of as much as Borel reducibility, and degree conserving workforce activities thought of as much as orbit equivalence. right here $E$ is related to be Borel reducible to $F$ if there's a Borel functionality $f$ with $x E y$ if and provided that $f(x) F f(y)$.

- Holomorphic Curves in Symplectic Geometry
- Affine Differential Geometry: Geometry of Affine Immersions
- Geometry of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces
- J-holomorphic curves and quantum cohomology
- A Survey of Minimal Surfaces (Dover Phoenix Editions)
- Monomialization of Morphisms from 3-folds to Surfaces

**Extra info for A Theory of Branched Minimal Surfaces**

**Sample text**

Then, by a suitable β choice of τ = φ(0) and Dt φ(0), one can achieve that E (m+1) (0) < 0 and E (j ) (0) = 0 for 1 ≤ j ≤ m. Proof Set N := L − 1, M := L − (α + β + 1) = N − (α + β), hence L − 1 = α + β + M. By Leibniz’s formula, DtN {[Zˆ w · Zˆ w ]φ} = N−β N α=0 β=0 N! N −β−α ˆ β Zw ) · (Dtα Zˆ w )Dt φ. (N − β − α)! 1 The Strategy of the Proof 39 we can use Leibniz’s formula to compute E (L) (t) from E (L) (t) = 2 Re S1 wDtN {[Zˆ w (t) · Zˆ w (t)]φ(t)} dw. We choose L := m + 1; then L ≥ 5 as we have assumed m ≥ 4.

Now, if we know that the image under Xˆ of a small neighbourhood U of 0 is an analytic regular (embedded) surface S, then w = 0 is a false branch point and it is not hard to see that w = 0 is also analytically false. To this end, let Y : U → S be a C 2,α smooth regular conformal parametrization of f . Then ϕ := Y −1 ◦ X is conformal and we may presume holomorphic. Since Xˆ has a branch point of order n, ϕ locally has the form ϕ(z) = an+1 wn+1 + · · · , where an+1 = 0. Therefore, there is a holomorphic function ψ defined on a neighbourhood V ⊂ U of 0 such that ϕ = ψ n+1 and we may assume ψ : V → ψ(V ) is biholomorphic.

By Leibniz’s formula, DtN {[Zˆ w · Zˆ w ]φ} = N−β N α=0 β=0 N! N −β−α ˆ β Zw ) · (Dtα Zˆ w )Dt φ. (N − β − α)! 1 The Strategy of the Proof 39 we can use Leibniz’s formula to compute E (L) (t) from E (L) (t) = 2 Re S1 wDtN {[Zˆ w (t) · Zˆ w (t)]φ(t)} dw. We choose L := m + 1; then L ≥ 5 as we have assumed m ≥ 4. 1) where the terms J1 , J2 , J3 are defined as follows: Set ˆ T α,β := w(Dtα Z(0)) w Dt φ(0). 2) Then, J1 := 4 Re S1 ˆ w τ ) dw ˆ [DtL−1 Z(0)] w · (w X + 4 · (L − 1) Re L−3 +4 M> 12 (L−1) S1 ˆ [DtL−2 Z(0)] w f dw (L − 1)!